Both women and millennials are reported to have some of the highest levels of interest in socially responsible investing, but they may not be as actively engaged in the field as we think as decision makers. As numbers demonstrate, 70% of women are interested in impact investing, and many reports show that women categorically say they want both a financial and social return on their investments.
If we narrow our focus on young women, Morgan Stanley data show that 86% of millennials (broadly defined as those who were born between 1980s and 2000) are interested in socially responsible investing. Yet, looking at the intersection between these two populations, we find that female millennials are less likely to make investment decisions for themselves when compared to previous generations. In fact, 61% of millennial women surveyed by UBS leave investment decisions to their husbands, more than any other recent generation.
The millennial conundrum
Why are millennial women—more educated, more successful and more outspoken than ever—leaving major decisions about money to someone else? Why are younger women perpetuating the status quo rather than transforming it? Do data from Latin America and the Caribbean support these UBS data about millennial women with similar trends, or is this an US and European phenomenon only?
Millennial women not making their own investment decisions matter for three main economic reasons:
They are likely missing opportunities to support impact investing vehicles. When they yield their financial decisions to their husbands, women may not be strongly investing in local or global issues they care about, whether that’s healthcare, education, conversation, microfinance, gender equality, sustainable agriculture, community development, and the like. If women aren’t at the wheel of their investments, meaningful social change may not be fully unleashed.
They may not be neither maximizing their own wealth creation nor creating a realistic plan for their future. Many women’s life events and situations introduce barriers to creating wealth. A 26% pay gap in the LAC region, taking careers breaks, and working flexibly can also have a detrimental impact on women’s wealth creation, and their investment strategies benefit from taking these factors into account. On average, women tend to live longer than men in LAC by 6.3 years, so their wealth-planning needs must often span a lengthier time horizon. These women would benefit from investment strategies that reflect these realities.
A massive wealth transfer is coming, and Latina women should be prepared. Globally, women will inherit $28.7 trillion in intergenerational wealth over the next 40 years. We know millennial women are comfortable investing in other women philanthropically, but the question is: how to transition them from their comfort zone in philanthropy to investing?
So, how do we increase the knowledge, confidence and number of active female millennial investors in the LAC region, and guide them to socially responsible investment options?